Re: Vintage Polaroid SX-70

yup, it's exactly what you're good at......


On Jul 9, 5:44=A0pm, "Guardian Angel"
<guardian___angel___REMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> nothing to say here....just wasting time."Pe Bakk" <pe.b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=
wrote in message
>
> news:U4-dnQQAv7Y9rejVnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Greg Goss wrote:
> >> "Try It" <nikon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> These cameras are $1 garage sale items. Some people will pay more
for
> >>> the case than for the camera. =A0Polaroid stopped producing instant
f=
ilm
> >>> about 4 months ago and it's only available while supplies last (6 to
=
9
> >>> months).
>
> >> You can never tell what will catch the fancy of collectors. =A0But
fou=
r
> >> months after production stopped is a bit too close to "normal" for
> >> collectors to care. =A0The leather and chrome one with the Fresnel
SLR
> >> would probably be more valuable than any of the all-plastic ones.
=A0W=
e
> >> can probably assume he has that version. =A0The plastic ones will
like=
ly
> >> never have collectible value.
>
> >> (I'm not a customer. =A0I talk because I find stuff interesting, even
=
on
> >> a forsale group. =A0If that doesn't work for you, killfile me.)
>
> > You're correct, I do have the leather and chrome SLR version of the
SX-=
70.
> > I didn't mention it in the post as the photos on the website clearly
sh=
ow
> > that. =A0Obviously, though, it probably would have been a good idea to
=
add
> > that info. =A0Thanks for the heads up. :)
>
> > As for your desire to talk about interesting stuff, I definitely
> > appreciate that. =A0Your original post just seemed to come across to
me=
 as
> > challenging my claim that the battery was working. I'm completely
willi=
ng
> > to take the blame for that assumption. =A0Hopefully my response to
your=
 post
> > helped provide possibilities for why the battery works fine. :)
>
> > --
> > pe bakk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -