Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Classifieds > Canada – Saskatchewan > Re: FS: 1995 HO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 36 Topic 25980 of 26269
Post > Topic >>

Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6

by sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 05:28 PM

Anony wrote:
> 
> 
> sn00p wrote:
>> Dong wrote:
>>> sn00p wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> According to your logic, someone is retarded to make the 'book 
>>>>> value' of 'high mileage jap crap car' higher than low mileage us
car.
>>>> so your logic... right there quoted above, says that book value is 
>>>> higher than a low mileage us car?  well book value is $2500, so then 
>>>> again, by your logic, a low mileage us car costs less than $2500? 
>>>> remind me again how this makes your car fit in at $6000?
>>> The context is that sn00p wrote:
>>> "this is just another high mileage jap crap car that someone thinks 
>>> is worth a mint just because it's japanese.  it's old and high 
>>> mileage, for anyone to pay $6000+ for it, they must be retarded"
>>>
>>> How about they paid $5000+ for it?
>>>
>>> The car I posted is definitely worth more than the 'book value'. How 
>>> much it can be sold is another question. If a fellow went to your 
>>> dealer****p and bought a vehicle for the amount listed on the price 
>>> tag, would you think s/he is 'retarded'?
> 
> Snoop does seem to think so.
> 
>>> Or if s/he asked about its 'book value' or how much you had really 
>>> paid for it, would you have the same idea?
>>>
>>> OK, thats it. I wont say more about this. Good to have a dealer here 
>>> for policing used vehicle prices.
> 
>> hey, i'm not trying to get you all rowled up here. 
> 
> then why do you choose to do so?
> 
>  i don't have any
>> shame in honesty.  honesty and telling a purchaser a whole and 
>> complete truth without sugar coating things is the most straight 
>> forward way to conduct yourself. 
> 
> but you're not - you posted an alleged price from *1* auction, which 
> means NOTHING by itself as the condition etc is NOT known, then tried to

> act as an authority on this vehicle by adding in comments like bad 
> history, etc, when YOU don't know anything about it - have you gone and 
> seen it? don't think so.
> 
> 
>  if you want a car dealer that will stroke your ego
>> and tell you what you'd like to hear, then you're only setting 
>> yourself up to pay too much or buy a vehicle with a bad history
> 
> Why all of a sudden would it have a bad history?  Are you the only 
> demi-god that has access to black book or carfax or etc? don't think so.
it was the results from the last 2 weeks of dealer auction to make sure 
it's current.  there were more results that were older with similar 
pricing, but from the mentality of the likes of you, you'd find reason 
to pick it apart saying it's not current.

jesus christ, i had 1 comment, and i'm not the one choosing to keep this 
going, i'm replying to the flamers because i am not the type to just go 
away with my tail between my legs.  posting the value of a vehicle is 
not flaming, someone like you pouncing on this and picking it apart 
however is, but that's usenet.... so knock yourself out, flame away.  i 
make no apologies for my actions because i don't see any wrong doing.  i 
have had people contact me as a result of me "price policing" vehicle 
posts, thanking me for saving them money and asking me to find them a 
vehicle for a fair value.... and i have sold to them, in spite of 
flamers like you.

fact of the matter is, this post started with a guy asking six thousand 
dollars for a car that should sell for $4000, get over yourselves 
already.  like the price police don't ever comment on anything else 
around here, i just don't slither away and drop it if i feel i am in 
line, all my figures are in line and posted to back me up as more than 
just personal opinion.  cry me a river for trying to do good to some 
other people who use usenet, where is the benefit of you being involved 
all of the sudden, this is going to help the op get $6000 for his car or 
going to help a prospective buyer in his decision.... no, not at all, 
has sweet f*ck all to do with it, my comment, was beneficial (maybe not 
to the op, but to a purchasers decision)

i am not giving up on this for being wrong, but i am for the matter of 
time, it's not worth having to justify anything to the likes of you.
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 10:41:16 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 15:13:04 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 15:46:21 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 17:46:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 18:07:56 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 08:52:29 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 09:28:11 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
riverbian@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-06 19:42:43 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 19:30:58 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 16:55:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 18:36:45 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 05:42:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 08:23:58 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 09:54:53 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 10:29:12 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 11:06:22 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 13:24:35 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:47:28 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 17:28:02 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
wasteOfTime <wasteOfTi  2008-05-09 17:55:19 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-10 09:16:50 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 04:53:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 01:06:01 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-10 09:24:10 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 22:21:10 
Private Message
   2008-05-10 23:51:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
vahooka <va@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-10 17:48:36 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
ddcwad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 14:10:39 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 15:53:22 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
"Guardian Angel"  2008-05-08 18:27:48 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 08:18:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
"Guardian Angel"  2008-05-09 09:48:23 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 10:32:18 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:43:25 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:39:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Goro <viker249@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 08:43:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 21 20:43:35 CDT 2008.