Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Classifieds > Canada – Saskatchewan > Re: FS: 1995 HO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 36 Topic 25980 of 26427
Post > Topic >>

Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6

by Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 09:54 AM

sn00p wrote:
> Anony wrote:
>>
>>
>> sn00p wrote:
>>> Anony wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> riverbian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>> Are you kidding? I just bought a 1993 Honda Accord with
260,000kilos,
>>>>> I paid for $5500. Tell me where to buy a $2500 car as ads above.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree - it's always amazing how cheap some people can be - they 
>>>> hear that maybe once some friend's uncle's twice removed second 
>>>> cousins neighbor's friend who lives next door to some pawn shop in 
>>>> Mexico once heard some story about car 'X' selling for 'X' $ and 
>>>> they think that means ALL similar cars are only worth that.
>>>>
>>>> THe low prices listed are even less than black book value for a poor 
>>>> condition car (for that vehicle), and in an auction where public 
>>>> does NOT have access, therefore that is NOT a retail/private value, 
>>>> but rather a value for getting rid of a junker where it needs lots 
>>>> of repair (maybe engine or body work) and is in rough condition or 
>>>> is for parts.
>>>>
>>>> Realistic prices can be found by looking at the Gold Book value 
>>>> (available free to look at at any Saskatoon Public Library) and the 
>>>> auto trader site has a good price range shopping.
>>
>>> has nothing to do with cheap, i'm not buying it... 
>>
>> No one said YOU were cheap nor buying it - why are you reading things 
>> into what people say, just like:
>>
>> only added in the
>>> last tidbit of info he didn't add in with all his other description. 
>>
>> and why is that im****tant whether he did, or not? And what if people 
>> don't have access to your holy price book? If no one is interested, 
>> then he'll get no calls - there is no reason to comment in a way that 
>> implies, to most people reading, that an advertiser is somehow being 
>> not forthcoming or is overcharging or whatever. don't recall anyone 
>> asking anyone else to be price policing vehicle posts in this group.
>>
>>  as
>>> far as book value goes, it is what it is, and it is im****tant to 
>> true - it's just a number in a book
>>
>>> consider given that if it were to be in an accident, sgi will 
>>> reference that value, and if the end buyer needs to borrow money to 
>>> buy it, their bank will look at that value as well.  
>>
>> Perhaps, but not really, as they WILL look at retail or market value 
>> and things like Gold Book value & Auto Trader & newspaper pricing, 
>> *NOT* beat up black book value. Even tho' you declare the price you 
>> paid when registering a vehcile for plates at SGI, that does *NOT* 
>> mean you would never get more than that if it was, say, totalled. SGI 
>> considers replacement cost, current value of the existing vehicle 
>> which includes all things like condition, kms, parts & salvage value, 
>> etc. Gerry (now a former neighbour) was hit (not his fault) - book 
>> value on his old car (it was just a daily driver) was $550, but when 
>> they inspect it and see it's great condition (except now totalled and 
>> not worth repairing) and he has every receipt for every 10cent bulb 
>> ever put in it, they pay him $2300 - book value meant nothing. Gerry 
>> later started working for SGI and tells of other such incidents: eg 87 
>> Buick Grand Regal - owner obsessive compulsive, garage kept, never out 
>> in winter or rain, passengers had to wear bags on their feet to 
>> protect carpet, etc - totalled - not a special car at all, owner got 
>> $23,000 because that was what was needed to replace with a similar 
>> condition vehicle even tho' that was NOT what book value is. eg2: 2000 
>> Dodge Grand Caravan with 643,000 highway kms, not loaded, but other 
>> than the number on the dash (a sales guy) looks and drives and was 
>> (until backed into by a semi) a premium vehicle with perfect 
>> maintenance - it was *NOT* degraded at all due to kms, so value was 
>> not depreciated, due to kms, by SGI, so he got the same $ as same 
>> vehicle retail price on a dealer lot with only 76,000k.
>>
>> you are absolutely right, it will
>>> sell for more than that, that is the price a dealer will pay for it, 
>>> and dealers make profit on what they sell.  
>>
>> Of course they try to - everyone has to eat, but sometimes things sell 
>> at a loss to stop the bleeding of carrying charges, etc too.
>>
>> but if you think for a minute
>>> that a dealer doubles his money on the things he sells, you are dead 
>>> wrong.
>>
>> uhhh, no. People other than yourself work in the auto industry too. 
>> There is LOTS of markup on some things eg. connector cable I was 
>> looking at the other day, full dealer cost (incl the 'S&H' & labour 
>> into the dealer & stocking & etc) was $3.31 - sell price $59.61
>>
>>> i buy vehicles at auction all the time to make profit on them, 
>>
>> OK, we see now, so a motive exists to downgrade anyone elses vehicle 
>> posts to make your selling look more attractive.
>>
>> it's what
>>> a dealer does, it does not mean that the motor is weak or body is
rough. 
>>
>> It doens't mean it isn't either.
>>
>>>  5000-6000 vehicles are bought at dealer auctions ever week across 
>>> canada, it's not that there are that many lemons out there, it's just 
>>> how we do business.  
>>
>>> now settle down and have a cookie
>>
>> Why are you assuming I'm unsettled - you posted an unrequested 
>> comment, so then you have to live with replies to it, and the same 
>> rules should then apply to you also, in that others can comment as 
>> much as they want too.
> knock yourselves out
> this is just another high mileage jap crap car that someone thinks is 
> worth a mint just because it's japanese.  it's old and high mileage, for

> anyone to pay $6000+ for it, they must be retarded
According to your logic, someone is retarded to make the 'book value' of 
'high mileage jap crap car' higher than low mileage us car.
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 10:41:16 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 15:13:04 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 15:46:21 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 17:46:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 18:07:56 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 08:52:29 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 09:28:11 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
riverbian@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-06 19:42:43 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 19:30:58 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 16:55:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 18:36:45 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 05:42:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 08:23:58 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 09:54:53 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 10:29:12 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Dong <edongliu@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 11:06:22 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 13:24:35 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:47:28 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 17:28:02 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
wasteOfTime <wasteOfTi  2008-05-09 17:55:19 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-10 09:16:50 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 04:53:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 01:06:01 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-10 09:24:10 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 22:21:10 
Private Message
   2008-05-10 23:51:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
vahooka <va@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-10 17:48:36 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
ddcwad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 14:10:39 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 15:53:22 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
"Guardian Angel"  2008-05-08 18:27:48 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 08:18:08 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
"Guardian Angel"  2008-05-09 09:48:23 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
sn00p <nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 10:32:18 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:43:25 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Anony <Anony@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 22:39:24 
Re: FS: 1995 HONDA ACCORD EX-R V-6
Goro <viker249@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 08:43:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 20:01:02 CDT 2008.