Re: lickton's gets no more business from me!

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:37:09 GMT, "Leo Lichtman"
<l.lichtman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"walter" wrote:  (clip) further try to justify that
>> because they need to subsidize the ****pping costs on kryptonite locks. 
>> (clip)
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Lemme guess.  They didn't actually say that you were subsidizing
Kryptonite 
>locks.  They tried to point out that they have a minimum charge, which 
>results in less margin for handling on the heavier items (like Kryptonite

>locks.)
>
>It would be a good customer relations ploy to have a sub-minimum charge
for 
>items that will fit in a first-class envelope. 
>
Stickers?
-- 
zk